What if the reason you are so exhausted isn’t because too many people need something from you, but because every time you want to say no, you feel like you have to build a case for why you’re allowed to?
In this episode, I’m going to show you why you feel compelled to explain yourself, the three traps I want you to avoid, what happens when people push back, and what God says to do instead.
Imagine this: someone asks you to lunch on Saturday, and before you even know whether you want to go, your mind is already somewhere else entirely.
“What do I have to do that day?”
“Could I say I have work?”
“Maybe I’ll tell them I’ve had a crazy week.”
“Will that be enough to get them to understand? Or do I need it to be something more important?”
My friend, you’re not deciding—you’re building a case.
And here’s the part that should stop you cold if you really look at this: you actually feel relieved when you are busy.
Not because you want to be busy, not because you want your whole calendar full, but because now you have a reason that no one can argue with.
So, let me ask you the question that’s underneath all of this, the one that we’re going to spend the next few minutes answering:
Why does “I have three appointments that day” feel legitimate, but “I don’t want to” feel selfish?
Both lead to the same result. You’re not agreeing, and you’re not going, but one feels justified while the other feels inexcusable.
Because if you’ve ever once let yourself decline something just because you didn’t want to—no illness, no conflict, no prior commitment, just “I don’t want to”—I think you’re going to recognize yourself in the next few minutes more than you’d like to.
So, let’s dive in.
You Learned That No Wasn’t Enough
You learned that no wasn’t a complete sentence.
You see, my friend, it didn’t start with that lunch invitation. It started years before in hundreds of small micro-moments where a plain “no” wasn’t allowed to stand on its own.
And maybe for you, the pattern went like this: you said no, and what came back wasn’t acceptance—it wasn’t
“Okay, no, that’s disappointing, but I understand”
or
“Oh, that’s too bad.”
It was a negotiation:
“Why can’t you change your appointment?”
It was woundedness:
“It’s okay, I understand.”
It was guilt:
“Oh, after all that I’ve done for you?”
It was criticism:
“You’re too busy. Maybe you should learn to manage your time better.”
It was an accusation:
“You’ve changed.”
Or worse, it was them telling other people how selfish you’ve become.
Somewhere along the way, without ever consciously deciding it, you learned a rule that has been running your calendar ever since.
Because what you learned is: don’t just give them an answer. You have to give them an answer that they can’t argue with.
And that’s where explaining stopped being communication and became all about protection.
I had a friend years ago who always had a crisis going on. There was always an emergency, always drama, always something happening. And somehow it was always someone else’s fault.
In the beginning, I felt for her. I was like, “Wow, she’s got a really hard life. She’s juggling a lot.” So, I wanted to help, and I started offering to pick up her daughter when she had an emergency.
Then it stopped being an emergency, and it stopped being an offer—it became the plan. She’d be running late at work or running late for an appointment, and she’d just call and I’d go get her daughter. No questions asked, because I never taught her or myself that there was a question to ask.
It kept landing at the same exact time of day, and to be honest with you, I had nothing left to give. It was my only downtime—a 40-minute window in between gearing down from work and gearing back up again. Every single time, I felt guilty for even wanting to say no.
But I started to recognize the pattern. I was learning that it was okay to say ‘no,’ but the problem was I still didn’t believe a plain ‘no’ was enough on its own. I believed my ‘no’ needed an alibi.
So, when she called that day again—of course she did, because that had just become the plan—I told her I had an appointment. She said, “Oh, okay, that’s okay. You can pick her up after.” And there I was, cornered by my own alibi. “No,” I said, “I just don’t know how long it’s going to run.” I hung up the phone, and for about a second and a half, I felt relief. Then the real stress set in.
We lived close enough to each other that if she came home and saw my car sitting in the driveway, my alibi would fall apart without her ever having to ask a single question.
This is going to be embarrassing—just keep in mind, this was a very long time ago—so I actually considered parking my car down the street. Then I thought, “She’s probably going to have to pass that and might notice it too.” So, I left. I got in my car and drove around for an hour just so my own driveway wouldn’t expose the alibi I never needed to have in the first place.
My one hour of downtime turned into an afternoon I lost entirely because I was stressed out trying to give her a good enough explanation. I was stressed in the moment of trying to tell her no, and then I was stressed afterward figuring out how not to get caught in my lame alibi when, at the end of the day, all I needed was to stand on my own ‘no.’
My one hour of downtime turned into an afternoon of complete stress—not spent helping her, not even resting, but just maintaining a story. All because I believed my ‘no’ needed permission.
Okay, so here’s where this pattern gets very specific, because somewhere along the way, you sorted your reasons into two piles without ever meaning to.
Some reasons are socially acceptable. These all get nods and understanding from people.
“I’m working,”
“I have an appointment,”
“Jimmy’s in the hospital,”
“I’m exhausted,”
“I don’t feel well,”
“I’ve got the flu,”
“We’re traveling,”
“My house is on fire.”
But these reasons feel dangerous. These are seen as unacceptable responses.
“I’d rather stay at home,”
“I need time to myself,”
“I’m just a little worn out,”
“That’s not how I want to spend my Saturday,”
“I don’t want to,”
“No, thank you.”
So, a belief formed underneath all of that—one you’ve probably never said out loud until right now—is:
“My preference isn’t sufficient. I need a sufficient circumstance that gives me permission.”
That belief is exactly how your calendar quietly became part of your boundary system, making you feel like you have to keep coming back in to explain and re-explain yourself to somebody who’s just not interested in understanding you.
I lived my life like this for a very long time—so long that I didn’t even realize it was partly the reason why I became so chronically busy.
Now, here’s the turn I don’t think you’re expecting: if busyness is the only excuse that you can actually trust, the only one that reliably works, think about what happens on an empty Saturday.
An empty Saturday now becomes a problem.
“Well, if you’re not doing anything, why can’t you come?”
So, you fill it: work, errands, projects, obligations, appointments, helping somebody else with something that needs you. There’s always something to get done.
Eventually, you are genuinely exhausted—not because you don’t know how to rest, but because rest leaves you without an excuse.
Here’s the actual cycle I want you to look at, because once you see it, you’re going to begin to recognize the panic that you feel when others are just trying to include you: You don’t believe that your preference alone is enough reason to say no. So, you go looking for a legitimate reason instead, and busyness is legitimate. Everyone accepts it; nobody argues with it.
So, without ever deciding to, you keep yourself busy.
Now you are genuinely busy, and you don’t want to be. You are genuinely exhausted, and you don’t want to be. And your exhaustion finally gives you permission to say no.
Because a lot of times—and here’s one thing I want to touch on, a bit of a rabbit trail, so humor me for a moment—when we’re the type of people who think,
“I owe you an explanation,”
we will be physically busy all the time, and we will be mentally busy all the time.
We will be trying to work it out, whether it’s with that other person by arguing or trying to get them to understand, or we’re going through mental gymnastics—mentally spiraling and ruminating over every little conversation and interaction to the point where we absolutely do get exhausted.
Here’s the trail I wanted to go down for a minute: I want you to be very careful that you do not mistake that exhaustion for peace. Because here’s what that misinterpretation trains you to do: when you get to a place where you are so mentally, physically, and emotionally exhausted, you start to become a little numb.
You’re drained, and you’ve got nothing left.
The body goes into a kind of depression mode. I’m talking about your body shutting down a little bit to say, “You need to recover here.”
I’ve noticed a lot of times that we will mistake this shutdown for a sense of peace, because we think we’re not ruminating or arguing anymore. But the truth is, you’re just exhausted, and it’s only going to take the next interaction to activate this all over again.
So, I want you to be very careful if you’re the type that feels like you can’t say no to someone without an explanation, or if you feel like you have to explain yourself six ways to Sunday:
“No, you misunderstand me,”
“No, that’s not what I meant,”
“No, that’s not my intention,”
“No, that’s not what I wanted to do.”
You will get yourself sufficiently exhausted and emotionally, mentally, and physically fired up, so your body’s going to be constantly activated, feeling busy. Now, you are busy because that’s the only thing that gives you a justification. And once you crash, you feel like that’s a sense of peace.
My friend, this can become a trained cycle where you subconsciously think,
“Yes, this is the route that I have to go in order to get to that place of peace.”
I’m here to tell you that that’s a lie, because that’s not the place of peace God needs to bring you to. He gave us His peace so that we can receive it freely, not have to emotionally, mentally, and physically work ourselves up in order to reach it.
I’ll tell you where this made a connection for me. This was many years ago when I had developed a sleeping disorder. I had a very demanding business where I was constantly interacting with people. Now, I am an introvert, so I need a lot of alone time to regenerate. I process thoughts internally; I like to be alone with the Lord. But what was happening was that all day long I was being called on, activated, putting out fires, negotiating things, and making decisions, and I was absolutely exhausted.
When I got to the end of the day, which was usually around 11:00 at night, that was the only time I had to myself. So, I would take maybe four, five, or sometimes six hours just to gather myself, read a little bit, or have time to myself. What happened was that I developed insomnia. I trained myself not to sleep because that time to myself was so valuable, and it was the only time I ever got.
Long story short, I went to a nutrition expert, and we were working together. One of the issues I ran into was that I wasn’t getting enough sleep. If you’ve ever tried to lose weight or get healthy while your sleep is compromised, you’re fighting a very steep uphill battle. When I shared with her that the only way I could get a decent night’s sleep and fall asleep was if I was sufficiently physically exhausted—now, I’ve always been an athlete, so it took a lot to get physically exhausted. Then she told me, “That’s not how it’s supposed to be. Your body should be able to quiet down in the evening without having to be absolutely exhausted to get there.”
That’s when I made that mental connection: we should not have to be so physically, mentally, and emotionally exhausted just so we can rest. Because that’s not rest—that’s just exhaustion.
So, I want to ask you a question: have you ever noticed that you don’t allow yourself to say no until you’re exhausted enough that nobody else could reasonably expect you to say yes?
If that’s true, your exhaustion was never really about your schedule.
It was the permission slip you didn’t believe you were allowed to write for yourself.
But there’s a version of this that is actually the hardest to spot because it doesn’t sound like pressure. In fact, it sounds a lot like understanding and compassion, and it goes something like this: you decline something with one of your acceptable excuses, and they say,
“Oh, I know you’re so busy.”
You’re thinking,
“Okay, they understand.”
It sounds so gracious, and sometimes it even is. But other times, underneath all of that, there’s an assumption tagging along for free:
“Of course you’d spend time with me if only your unfortunate busyness wasn’t the problem.”
Which brings us back to: your busyness is the only legitimate reason on the table. Which means that you still don’t feel free to say,
“Actually, no, I’m not busy—I just don’t want to do that today.”
Because now, what are you? Selfish, unloving, cold, someone who doesn’t care?
That’s the actual prison, my friend—not the schedule. It’s the belief that only a full calendar earns you the right to say no. All the while, they criticize your full calendar, but the minute there’s space in it, guess who jumps in? Guess who expects to fill it?
Because they don’t see their selfishness as the problem—they see your schedule as the problem.
And each time you apologize for being too busy, you actually stand in agreement with them.
Watch Out For The Trap
Sometimes they don’t argue with you directly, and you think that’s good, right?
They accept your excuse or your reason; they don’t say anything.
But you know. You know what they’re doing: they’re going around telling everyone else,
“She’s selfish right now,”
“She’s too busy for family,”
“She thinks she’s better than us,”
“Everything has to be on his terms these days.”
Now, you’ve got a second job on top of the exhausting first one. Not just defending the boundary, my friend—now you’ve got to defend your reputation.
So, you start explaining yourself to people who weren’t even in the room:
“No, that’s not what happened. What she didn’t tell you was this…
“Well, I actually offered to…”
One simple no generated hours of unpaid emotional labor, making you wonder if saying yes would have just cost you less.
This is why, a lot of times, we make agreements that we don’t want to make: because the relational fallout that follows is often too much to bear.
This doesn’t just have to do with saying no to people and commitments; this also has to do with not explaining yourself when you feel like you have to defend yourself.
Toxic people have a way of expecting you to be emotionally responsible for them. They will never say it or admit it—in fact, they’re the first to say,
“No, I’m independent. I don’t care what you think about me or what you say about me.”
That is entirely untrue.
What happens is you get into this dynamic with a narcissist, a toxic person, codependency, or neediness. Anybody who needs an explanation for what should just be an answer begins to cause all of this emotional fallout.
You start to train yourself to be on guard:
“I now have to figure out where this is going.”
For something that should just allow you to be yourself, you are now required to explain yourself:
“You’re going to wear that?”
“Oh, why did you end up doing that?”
“Well, what did you mean by that?”
“Why did you say that?”
Now, I am not talking about healthy relationship dynamics where somebody misunderstood you and is asking for clarity. That is very healthy. If they misunderstood you, they should not be making assumptions; they should say,
“Hey, what do you mean by that?”
Then you can have a healthy conversation.
What I’m talking about is having to constantly justify yourself, explain yourself, and explain your decisions to somebody. Because they are controlling, or it doesn’t suit their narrative, or because they are somehow vested in another decision that they want you to make. Now you have to constantly explain yourself, or they just don’t seem to respect your boundaries and limits, and they want to know why.
If in the past their pushback has left you so sufficiently drained, that you’ve just given in because it’s easier to say yes, then you’ve trained that relationship.
And, I’m not blaming you, because yes, other people should be considerate, but my friend, it is your responsibility if you want to say no to say no.
It is not a loving response to expect somebody to know what you’re thinking and feeling. That is not love or care—it is codependency when you expect somebody else to just know. Even if you have told them a couple of times, expecting them to know in that moment and holding it against them when they don’t respond the way you want them to puts them on emotional defensiveness where they’re now trying to pull it out of you:
“What’s wrong? What happened?”
They’re trying to figure it out, and you create this codependent dynamic.
We want to reach a point where we can sufficiently explain our motives, explain ourselves, or come to a place where we recognize,
“This doesn’t need an explanation.”
Here’s also what begins to fire off inside of you: resentment, frustration, maybe even anger or guilt.
When those elements start firing off, you’re no longer in a place where you can respond by speaking the truth in love, because now you’re responding out of activation. What they’ve activated in you was a launch sequence, and again, it’s exhausting.
Setting Boundaries as a Christian
My friend, there is hope, because it’s not just about setting boundaries as a Christian. It’s about what you do with the conversation in your head afterward.
It’s about what those boundaries and that relationship dynamic have taught you.
We’ve done a bang-up job pointing out their flaws, traits, and dysfunctions, but I want you to take a moment and ask yourself:
“What has this activated in me?”
“Do I now have a fear that if I don’t explain myself, everything is going to go sideways?” “Do I have a fear that they’re going to leave?”
“Do I have a fear that the next 24 to 48 hours—or longer—is just going to be tense and uncomfortable?”
“Do I have a fear that if everything starts to go wrong, I’m going to have to jump in and rescue the situation?”
“Do I have an expectation that they are supposed to know what I’m thinking, feeling, and needing in those moments?”
My friend, when we begin to identify what it activates within us, we can start to shut down the launch sequence. This isn’t just about setting boundaries as a Christian or telling yourself, “Stop explaining yourself.” It’s about addressing what is happening within you that is a trained pattern response, likely from the past.
It might be a trained pattern response from this very relationship. This relationship could have trained you that if you don’t explain yourself, they’re going to misunderstand you; if they misunderstand you, they’re going to blame you; if you don’t accept that blame, they’re going to give you the silent treatment; if you don’t apologize after the silent treatment, they’re going to stonewall you and talk about you to every church member and family member; and if that doesn’t work, they’re going to start threatening you.
Do you see what’s happening here?
Right in that moment, just telling yourself,
“Okay, I shouldn’t have to explain myself,”
doesn’t take away the fallout that you’re now going to have to be responsible for or pay the consequences for.
You may have become braver about the direct no. You may have finally stopped justifying yourself in the actual conversation. You may have even recognized,
“I don’t owe this person an explanation.”
But if you still can’t rest knowing that someone out there—including that person—has the wrong idea about you, my friend, you have not actually gotten free. You’ve just moved the courtroom further away.
I want to draw a real distinction here, because I don’t want to leave you with the idea that you should never correct anything anyone says about you.
There’s a difference between correcting consequential misinformation and needing everyone everywhere to hold an accurate opinion of your heart.
Sometimes correcting the record matters when it affects your family or reputation in a way that has real consequences, or when silence would let real harm stand unaddressed or let evil prevail.
But if you find yourself unable to sleep because someone you barely know—or even someone you do know—might be thinking something untrue about you and you feel you have to set the record straight, that’s not about protecting the truth anymore. That is still being governed by their perception, just from a greater distance.
Here’s a question worth sitting with: how much of your explaining is actual communication, and how much of it is an attempt to control what people think of you? Because what is being activated in you is going to speak volumes to that answer.
When someone demands an explanation from you, directly or indirectly, it activates something in you. That’s where you would do well to get before God and say,
“What is this activating within me? Why do I feel compelled to explain myself when my no should be sufficient?”
I also want you to be careful, because I’m not going to tell you that Scripture never says to explain yourself. It doesn’t say that at all.
In fact, Matthew 5:37 gives us the principle:
“Let what you say simply be ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil.”
In context, Jesus is talking about oaths—the elaborate ways that people in His day would try to reinforce the credibility of their words by swearing by heaven, earth, or their own head, stacking guarantee on top of guarantee because a plain yes or no wasn’t trusted to carry weight on its own.
In this scripture, He’s not specifically addressing over-explaining the reason why you want to decline a lunch invitation or why you don’t have to explain yourself for the 14th time that morning, but the principle underneath it absolutely applies here.
Your integrity should be strong enough that your yes can simply stand as yes and your no can simply stand as no, without needing a stack of evidence propping it up just to be respected. Your original answer should be able to stand on its own.
This is not permission to be cold, harsh, or dismissive. It’s a warning about piling justification on top of explanation because some part of you doesn’t trust a plain answer to be respected on its own—or because part of you doesn’t trust that God will defend you if needed.
A lot of times, our over-explaining and justifications are really protective, preventive mechanisms.
“I’m trying to prevent…” and fill in the blank.
That’s something I want you to give serious thought to, because it’s very easy to say,
“If they weren’t doing this, I wouldn’t do that.”
Every action has reactions, but what are you trying to prevent? What is your explanation trying to prevent?
At the end of the day, the teaching was never, “Don’t ever give anyone a reason.” What kind of relationships would we have if we walked around saying,
“No”
“Don’t want to”
“Uh-uh”
It’s not about never giving a reason; it’s that you don’t need to turn every decision into a closing argument.
Galatians 1:10 names exactly what is underneath this compulsion:
“For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.”
Paul isn’t talking about declining weekend plans; he’s talking about the Gospel itself. But the principle holds here: the moment you need someone’s agreement before your decision feels valid, you have quietly made them the authority over something that was never theirs to approve.
There will be relationships where an explanation is the most loving, appropriate, and necessary thing to do. But an explanation offered freely out of love is entirely different from a justification offered in hopes of obtaining permission.
Here’s where we really get caught up: we want to be strong Christians. We’ll say,
“We’re not people-pleasers. I don’t care what they think.”
But I’ve spoken to many of you, and I know you do care.
The beginning of true freedom and healing comes when you’re really being honest with yourself—when you do care more about what they think, when you do care what they say about you, and when their approval actually matters to you.
Because when you genuinely don’t care what somebody thinks, says, or does, it’s typically done without harshness or attitude. If we still have a bit of attitude behind it, it’s probably more of a protective mechanism than a genuine reality.
I know that was very helpful for me on my journey. It wasn’t until I came to the place where I was honest before God, saying,
“God, I require their approval above Yours. I don’t want it to be that way, and I don’t logically think that’s what’s going on, but my activated launch sequence says otherwise.”
So, I’m not here to tell you that “no is a complete sentence.” You’ve heard that 100 times, and if it worked, you wouldn’t still be building alibis for your excuses, your Saturdays, and your declining of invitations. The real skill isn’t just saying it—it’s what happens after you say it. Let me show you exactly what I mean:
You say,
“No, I won’t be able to make it.”
They pause and say,
“Oh, okay.”
You hear that shift in their voice—that flatness, a little distance that wasn’t there 12 seconds ago. Immediately, your nervous system activates. It wants to fix it, smooth it over, and make it all okay.
You jump in with,
“It’s just that I’ve been so busy lately…”
And there it is: you already said no. That explanation isn’t communicating anything new; all it’s doing is revealing the discomfort that their reaction created in you.
So, what do I want you to do instead?
Decide before you defend.
Ask yourself quietly before saying a single word out loud,
“Is this something God genuinely is asking of me?”
“Is this actually my responsibility?”
“Have I already explained this?”
“Do I have the capacity for this right now?”
Then answer accordingly.
If an explanation is warranted, offer one freely. But notice the exact moment you cross from informing into convincing.
I want you to explain to inform, don’t explain to convince.
If the 1st, 2nd, 12th, or 14th explanation didn’t land, my friend, it’s not information they need—it’s convincing, and that’s what you’re trying to do. Convincing can sometimes be a form of control.
Not only are you wasting your time and energy, but now you’re not allowing the other person the freedom to say,
“No, I don’t agree with you,”
“No, I don’t get it,” or indirectly,
“No, I don’t care to get it.”
What is this activating within you?
Catch yourself building the case.
The next thing I want you to do is to practice one undefended no this week. Make it low-stakes in a low-stakes situation. Decline with a single sentence: “That doesn’t work for me.” Then stop talking.
Don’t add “because,” don’t rush in with “but maybe next week,” and don’t start quietly rearranging your calendar in your mind the moment you sense they’re disappointed.
Just stay in the no, or let your explanation rest.
What you’re going to begin to notice is the discomfort getting activated within, and that’s where the real work begins to take place.
I want you to become a person who is so deeply rooted in your identity—in who you are and whose you are—that you don’t need to continue to defend yourself or have a “worthy enough” excuse to decline what they’re asking of you.
If you are watching the replay and want to know the three shifts that broke my need for their approval, check out this episode here.
And don’t forget to grab your free No Regret Response Guide. This guide shows you exactly how to respond in the moment without ever over-explaining, second-guessing, or getting pulled into exhausting, deadened conversations.
And before you go, make sure to check out this resource:
👉 Guilt-Free Boundaries That Stick
👉 Narcissist Survival Guide
👉 Breaking the Narcissist’s Grip – A Christians Guide to Cutting the Strings of Manipulation, Setting Boundaries That Stick and Reclaiming Your Life from Takers



